ANTHONY STROBRIDGE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ANTHONY STROBRIDGE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (ANTHONY STROBRIDGE v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ANTHONY STROBRIDGE, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D18-2299
[October 31, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara R. Duffy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-20573CF10A.
Michael Hursey, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachel Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CIKLIN, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ANTHONY STROBRIDGE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-strobridge-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.