Anthony Sorel Haywood v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 8, 2014·No. 01-13-00994-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Anthony Sorel Haywood v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-13-00994-CR

Trial court case number: 1373686

Trial court: 176th District Court of Harris County

On March 28, 2014, appellant Anthony Sorel Haywood filed a motion for extension of library time. The motion is DENIED. Appellant is not entitled to “hybrid representation,” which is defined as representation partly by counsel, partly by self. See, e.g., Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). Pro se motions filed by a criminal defendant already represented by counsel may be disregarded. Id.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 8, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Sorel Haywood v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Anthony Sorel Haywood v. State (Anthony Sorel Haywood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
240 S.W.3d 919 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)