Anthony Smith v. Ron Davis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anthony Smith v. Ron Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 953 F.3d 582
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 15, 2019·No. 17-15874·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 15 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY BERNARD SMITH, Jr., No. 17-15874

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.

2:15-cv-01785-JAM-AC

v. Eastern District of California, Sacramento

RON DAVIS, ORDER

Respondent-Appellee.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be

cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Smith v. Ron Davis, (9th Cir. 2019).

Anthony Smith v. Ron Davis (Anthony Smith v. Ron Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.