Anthony Smith v. Ron Davis
This text of Anthony Smith v. Ron Davis (Anthony Smith v. Ron Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 15 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY BERNARD SMITH, Jr., No. 17-15874
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01785-JAM-AC v. Eastern District of California, Sacramento RON DAVIS, ORDER Respondent-Appellee.
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be
cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anthony Smith v. Ron Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-smith-v-ron-davis-ca9-2019.