ANTHONY SIMMONS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ANTHONY SIMMONS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (ANTHONY SIMMONS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ANTHONY SIMMONS, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D18-2101
[July 21, 2021]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence Michael Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432014CF000117.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Breanna Atwood, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
Based on the Florida Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. Dortch, 46 Fla. L. Weekly S129 (Fla. May 20, 2021), we grant the State’s motion for rehearing. In Dortch, the supreme court held “there is no fundamental- error exception to the preservation requirement of” Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c). Id. We withdraw the previously issued panel opinion and affirm the final judgment of conviction.
Affirmed.
GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ANTHONY SIMMONS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-simmons-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.