ANTHONY SIMMONS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in ANTHONY SIMMONS v. STATE OF FLORIDA. Read the opinion of the Court — 271 So. 3d 997
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 21, 2021·No. 18-2101·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTHONY SIMMONS, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2101

[July 21, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence Michael Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432014CF000117.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Breanna Atwood, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Based on the Florida Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. Dortch, 46 Fla. L. Weekly S129 (Fla. May 20, 2021), we grant the State’s motion for rehearing. In Dortch, the supreme court held “there is no fundamental- error exception to the preservation requirement of” Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(c). Id. We withdraw the previously issued panel opinion and affirm the final judgment of conviction.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANTHONY SIMMONS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

ANTHONY SIMMONS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (ANTHONY SIMMONS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.