Anthony Sewell v. Angela Sewell
This text of Anthony Sewell v. Angela Sewell (Anthony Sewell v. Angela Sewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00486-CV ___________________________
ANTHONY SEWELL, Appellant
V.
ANGELA SEWELL, Appellee
On Appeal from the 481st District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 21-8447-16
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this divorce action, the trial court signed its final decree of divorce on
August 11, 2022. Appellant Anthony Sewell filed his motion for new trial on
September 12, 2022, thus extending his deadline for filing a notice of appeal to
November 9, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1) (requiring after the filing of motion
for new trial that notice of appeal be filed within ninety days after the judgment is
signed). Although the motion was overruled by operation of law on October 25,
2022, see Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(c), on November 9, 2022, the trial court signed an order
denying Sewell’s motion for new trial. Sewell then filed his notice of appeal on
December 9, 2022.
On December 12, 2022, we informed Sewell of our concern that we lacked
jurisdiction over his appeal because his notice of appeal was not timely filed. We
further informed him that, unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed
on or before December 22, 2022, a response showing grounds for continuing this
appeal, it might be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). We
received no such response.
After the timely filing of a motion for new trial, Appellate courts have
jurisdiction to consider an appeal only if the notice of appeal was filed within ninety
days of the final judgment. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1). An order denying a motion for
new trial does not extend this deadline. Naaman v. Grider, 126 S.W.3d 73, 74 (Tex.
2003).
2 Because Sewell’s notice of appeal was filed 120 days after the trial court’s final
divorce decree, he did not timely perfect his appeal. Thus, we must dismiss his appeal
for want of jurisdiction. See id.; see also Tex. R. App. P. 26.(1)(a), 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
/s/ Brian Walker
Brian Walker Justice
Delivered: January 12, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anthony Sewell v. Angela Sewell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-sewell-v-angela-sewell-texapp-2023.