Anthony Scaglione Noriega v. United States

382 F.2d 295
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 27, 1967
Docket22242
StatusPublished

This text of 382 F.2d 295 (Anthony Scaglione Noriega v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony Scaglione Noriega v. United States, 382 F.2d 295 (5th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered the record in this appeal from a conviction of the appellant on three counts of an information charging violation of Sections 5301(c) (2) and 5606, Title 26, United States Code.

Finding no error in the submission of the case to the jury and finding no error in the denial by the trial court of the motion for judgment n. o. v., we conclude that the judgment of conviction and sentence must be affirmed. See Stilinovic v. United States, 8 Cir. 1964, 336 F.2d 862, and see, as to the admission of the voluntary comments by appellant at the time of the investigation, Pennewell v. United States, 1965, 122 U.S.App. D.C. 332, 353 F.2d 870.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Emil N. Stilinovic v. United States
336 F.2d 862 (Eighth Circuit, 1964)
Thomas B. Pennewell v. United States
353 F.2d 870 (D.C. Circuit, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 F.2d 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-scaglione-noriega-v-united-states-ca5-1967.