Anthony Scaglione Noriega v. United States

382 F.2d 295
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 27, 1967·No. 22242·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered the record in this appeal from a conviction of the appellant on three counts of an information charging violation of Sections 5301(c) (2) and 5606, Title 26, United States Code.

Finding no error in the submission of the case to the jury and finding no error in the denial by the trial court of the motion for judgment n. o. v., we conclude that the judgment of conviction and sentence must be affirmed. See Stilinovic v. United States, 8 Cir. 1964, 336 F.2d 862, and see, as to the admission of the voluntary comments by appellant at the time of the investigation, Pennewell v. United States, 1965, 122 U.S.App. D.C. 332, 353 F.2d 870.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Scaglione Noriega v. United States, 382 F.2d 295 (5th Cir. 1967).

382 F.2d 295 (Anthony Scaglione Noriega v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Emil N. Stilinovic v. United States
336 F.2d 862 (Eighth Circuit, 1964)
Thomas B. Pennewell v. United States
353 F.2d 870 (D.C. Circuit, 1965)