Anthony Satterwhite v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 7, 2010·No. 13-09-00541-CR·Published

Opinion



NUMBER 13-09-00541-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ANTHONY SATTERWHITE, APPELLANT,



v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.



On appeal from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Anthony Satterwhite, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal.



Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM



Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed

the 7th day of January, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Satterwhite v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Anthony Satterwhite v. State (Anthony Satterwhite v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.