Anthony Sanchez v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 2, 2025
Docket3D2025-0652
StatusPublished

This text of Anthony Sanchez v. State of Florida (Anthony Sanchez v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony Sanchez v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 2, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-0652 Lower Tribunal No. F09-32944 ________________

Anthony Sanchez, Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces, Judge.

Anthony Sanchez, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Haccord J. Curry, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, C.J., and EMAS and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla. 2005) (“[A]ny

sentence, even one of a short duration, can potentially exceed a defendant’s

life span. The fact that the judicial system has no way of knowing how long

the defendant will live and therefore cannot know how long the defendant

will be incarcerated does not render a life sentence unconstitutionally

indefinite. It is abundantly clear that the Legislature, by prescribing a

sentence of life imprisonment, intends that the defendant remain in prison

for the rest of his life. The term ‘life’ is sufficiently definite so that it can be

understood and applied.” (internal citations omitted)); Alvarez v. State, 358

So. 2d 10, 12 (Fla. 1978) (“We reject the notion that an individual’s life

expectancy should be used, or was intended by the Legislature to be used,

to mark the longest term which a particular defendant should serve. Any

sentence, no matter how short, may eventually extend beyond the life of a

prisoner.”); Simmons v. State, No. 3D25-0655, 2025 WL 1700091, at *1 (Fla.

3d DCA June 18, 2025); Alvarez v. State, No. 3D25-0533, 2025 WL

1509636, at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA May 28, 2025); Jimenez-Solano v. State, No.

3D25-374, 2025 WL 1509570, at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA May 28, 2025); Lemon v.

State, No. 3D25-0535, 2025 WL 1450561, at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA May 21, 2025);

Padgett v. State, No. 3D25-0349, 2025 WL 1172840, at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr.

23, 2025); Holmes v. State, 245 So. 3d 857, 858 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018);

2 Johnson v. Crosby, 897 So. 2d 546, 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Lopez v. State,

895 So. 2d 1282, 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Enriquez v. State, 885 So. 2d

892, 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Enriquez v. State
885 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Alvarez v. State
358 So. 2d 10 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Johnson v. Crosby
897 So. 2d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Ratliff v. State
914 So. 2d 938 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Holmes v. State
245 So. 3d 857 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Lopez v. State
895 So. 2d 1282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anthony Sanchez v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-sanchez-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.