Anthony Sam Ladd v. Diquan Jones

• Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
• Decided: April 10, 2026
• Docket: 3:26-cv-00538
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

ANTHONY SAM LADD,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:26-cv-538-AW-ZCB

DIQUAN JONES,

Defendant.

_______________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, sued his son. He claims he deposited a disability check in his son’s account with the expectation that his son would return the funds. ECF No. 1. The complaint is on a form civil rights complaint for pro se prisoner litigants. Id. at 1. The form references § 1983 and §§ 1331 and 1346, and Plaintiff added a passing reference to the ADA. But the complaint, fairly read, presents no federal claim. The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation concluding the court should dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff filed no objection. I now adopt the report and recommendation and incorporate it into this order. As the magistrate judge notes, Plaintiff had the burden of establishing jurisdiction. And despite the form’s reference to federal statutes and Plaintiff’s passing reference to the ADA, there is no federal claim here. Cf. Rubinstein v. Yehuda, 38 F.4th 982, 993 (11th Cir. 2022) (“Not every complaint alleging a federal claim invokes federal question jurisdiction.”). There is also no diversity.

In light of this, Plaintiff has not met his burden of demonstrating jurisdiction. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed without prejudice based on lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.” The clerk will then close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 10, 2026. s/ Allen Winsor Chief United States District Judge