Anthony Saint Val v. Patricia Hill, Vice-President of Glencairn Association Board of Directors

Court of Appeals of Texas

Anthony Saint Val v. Patricia Hill, Vice-President of Glencairn Association Board of Directors

DecidedMay 4, 2021

Docket14-20-00811-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Anthony Saint Val v. Patricia Hill, Vice-President of Glencairn Association Board of Directors (Anthony Saint Val v. Patricia Hill, Vice-President of Glencairn Association Board of Directors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anthony Saint Val v. Patricia Hill, Vice-President of Glencairn Association Board of Directors, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Order filed May 4, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-20-00811-CV ____________

ANTHONY SAINT VAL, Appellant

V.

PATRICIA HILL, VICE-PRESIDENT OF GLENCAIRN ASSOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1129479

ORDER

On January 25, 2021, appellant filed a brief that is not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief fails generally to comply with the rules by failing to (1) state concisely all issues presented for review, (2) contain a succinct, clear, and accurate statement of the arguments made in the body of the brief, and (3) contain a clear and concise argument for the contentions made with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f), (h), and (i).

Accordingly, we order appellant’s brief filed January 25, 2021, stricken. Appellant is ordered to file a brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within ten (10) days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1.

If appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38, the court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. If appellant fails to timely file a brief in accordance with Rule 38, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Spain and Wilson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order filed May 4, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-20-00811-CV ____________

ANTHONY SAINT VAL, Appellant

V.

PATRICIA HILL, VICE-PRESIDENT OF GLENCAIRN ASSOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1129479

ORDER

On January 25, 2021, appellant filed a brief that is not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief fails generally to comply with the rules by failing to (1) state concisely all issues presented for review, (2) contain a succinct, clear, and accurate statement of the arguments made in the body of the brief, and (3) contain a clear and concise argument for the contentions made with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f), (h), and (i).

Accordingly, we order appellant’s brief filed January 25, 2021, stricken. Appellant is ordered to file a brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within ten (10) days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1.

If appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38, the court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. If appellant fails to timely file a brief in accordance with Rule 38, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Spain and Wilson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Anthony Saint Val v. Patricia Hill, Vice-President of Glencairn Association Board of Directors, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-saint-val-v-patricia-hill-vice-president-of-glencairn-association-texapp-2021.