Anthony Paul Marullo v. United States
This text of 330 F.2d 609 (Anthony Paul Marullo v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is ordered that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause is hereby denied.
One point deserves clarification. Petitioner argues that the search in question must be found to be “unreasonable” under the Fourth Amendment. He contends that the present case is controlled by Chapman v. United States, 1961, 365 U.S. 610, 81 S.Ct. 776, 5 L.Ed.2d 828. Since we held that the location of the evidence in question was not within the protection of the Fourth Amendment, the reasonableness of the search is not a relevant constitutional consideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
330 F.2d 609, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-paul-marullo-v-united-states-ca5-1964.