Anthony Paul DelaCruz v. State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 4, 2010
Docket11-10-00283-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Anthony Paul DelaCruz v. State of Texas (Anthony Paul DelaCruz v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony Paul DelaCruz v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Opinion filed November 4, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-10-00283-CR __________

ANTHONY PAUL DELACRUZ, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 32nd District Court

Fisher County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 3383

MEMORANDUM OPINION Anthony Paul DelaCruz1 was convicted of the offense of aggravated sexual assault of an elderly person. On August 4, 2010, the trial court sentenced him in open court to confinement for fifty years pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. We dismiss the appeal. A motion for new trial was not filed. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be filed within thirty days of the date the sentence was imposed in open court in order to timely perfect an appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2. Appellant filed his pro se notice of appeal on September 16,

1 The spelling of appellant’s name is taken from signature on notice of appeal and right of appeal. 2010, forty-three days after the date the sentence was imposed in open court. A motion to extend time was not filed pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Absent a timely notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion for extension of time, this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain an appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-24 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 109- 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Moreover, we note that the trial court stated in its certification of defendant’s right to appeal that this was a plea bargain agreement case and appellant had no right to appeal and that appellant had waived his right to appeal. The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

November 4, 2010 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shute v. State
744 S.W.2d 96 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Rodarte v. State
860 S.W.2d 108 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anthony Paul DelaCruz v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-paul-delacruz-v-state-of-texas-texapp-2010.