Anthony Obrian Davis v. State
This text of Anthony Obrian Davis v. State (Anthony Obrian Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00262-CR
Anthony Obrian DAVIS, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 08-0914-CR Honorable Dwight E. Peschel, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 2, 2010
DISMISSED
Anthony O. Davis pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated sexual assault of a child. The
trial court imposed sentence in accordance with Davis’s plea bargain agreement and signed a
certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX .
R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Davis timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the
trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See 04-10-00262-CR
TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the
defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id.
“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised
by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to
appeal.” TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record establishes this is a “plea bargain case” —
the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the
prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record does
not include a written motion filed and ruled upon before trial and it reflects the trial court denied
permission to appeal. The trial court’s certification therefore appears to accurately reflect that this
is a plea bargain case and Davis does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610
(Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine
whether trial court’s certification is accurate).
The court gave Davis notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court
certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record. No amended
certification showing Davis has the right to appeal has been filed. We therefore dismiss this appeal.
TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d).
Do not publish
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anthony Obrian Davis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-obrian-davis-v-state-texapp-2010.