Anthony Norman v. Ashlei Janak, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier, Shovanda D. Mathis, Margarita Thomas, Rocky Moore, and Tammy Shelby
Opinion
Anthony Norman, Plain 6
N.
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lampkin, Ashley Janak, Tammy Chap man Mana Thompson, Shovanda Mathir- Howard, Etal, DePendant(s).
MO TI0.N
FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS
3 IN THE AUSTIN, TEXAS 5 FEB 03 2005
B15 Distree Couch 8 Prornen a pane
8 § Appeals § PP
$ TRAVIS COUNTY , TEXAS 8 § cause no, 15-2Y4-00068-CW/
§
TO PROCEED
Now Comes, Anthony Norman, herein! “Mevant" y who beings thrs
MOTION ‘To PROCEED, herein: “Motron'. In Support, the Movant
would show!
T. Junsdiction
Movant Biles thir Mo tron pursuant TO Tex: ules of Appel ete
Procedure Raule(s) 10) and 20.1,
TL. Facts
1. Movant Filed an Onginal Petition in the Zoo Dimer Court, cause nd. D-~1-GN-002583, with TLPR An 14.004, 14.005
déedarations ;
2. On defendants moton, the case was transfered to the |@rh Distner Court cause nd. 2130570, albeit without lowFal
authority (jucitd icti0n Yj
3. Subs eanently » the 12th Distt Court violated any pretense of judicial discretion by dismissing rhe case for reasons which
eg i eFY do not Comocrt to Statutes, or established common law,
4. The zadt® Distitr Courts 14.004) 14.005 declaraieas exitt in the Record on AppeallCleas Read \ at (Ros Fo-72 ys
b, The necessary declarations were Filed aaain in the lah at CROA, LAW)s CROA.193-14 7); (ROA. 383-391) j
6. T2AP Rule 20 was invoked, proceeding on Appeal j the premire
being a tase Riled informa poupeny continuer informa pope, not necessitating rhe need to reLile the same declarativas .0r other duel rated papes on dvect App eal
7 Movant communnated hir understondng of the rule to the Clerk of the IDtk oA, and requested that the Clerk either
respect TAP Mule WD, or nonty the Movant of the neceyvit¥ ty submit duplicated papers. “The Clerk docketed rhe Appeal
(UCL 2.206),
8 Upon the Clerk failing to respond to the inquiry, the matter was thouaht to he settled;
4. The Cle of the loth GA later transfered the instant cawe to the (st COA;
10. Clerk, Char, Prine oF the IS? Courr of Appeals suc sponte, has raised ee Sammme 1554eT aSIErting far the flor time thar rhe TERP Act. 14.004, 14.005 Filings are absent, and seele bw ditmissal on or aPrer 7 Feb. 7025 C17 January 2025 correrpendene fram Chas A Prine rectived 25 Jan. 2025).
py Z of Y
Th ARGUMENT
Just in case, Movant has attached an additional declaratign complying with TROP Act 14004. The U.S. Mails are extremely slow.
Either TRAP Rule to applies, or it does not. The petitioner has not Filed an affidavit, oc declaration of inability 10 gay cost in the loth,-or (f* Court of Appeals. Filino a declatatton oc altrdevit is a ce quired triggering event see
“rox, Civ. Prac. 3 Rem. Code $ 14.0040), which clearly states: “An
inmate who Files an alB davit , or unswom declafations of inability tO pay cost shall Flea seperate affidavit or declaration: (...)."
No all dat, or declaration cCOmportng to IY. oy s re quirement t r a T
- was Filed.
‘There iS no statutory require ment to refile c gre vance déclatatun. Tn additidn, this 1S matter " Grie vances” Filed or not. - whith ry
propely befue the Isth CoA for wonsidelatren by the judgey of the (outt.
From a statuton perspective - a principle upon which the rules are are builry a courris cequised to observe the plain téxt of Statutey ( Tex, Go. SZN.ON, § 3)Z.007). Although Texas Ruler of Appellate Procedure were Nor cfeated by the legir lature, they are enabled, and
enforceable as statues via Tex. Consr Arh V ESI la-cdyond Tex. Gov. Code $22,108 La-c).
Petitioner, Would call the Clerk's attention to his Sept. ZY, 24, notice
that the cause was 1 be Submitted te the courr Cotobe 25,Z02y. Ded submisitn ofcur and if nor why nor!
pg 3 of 4
W. Remedy / Praver For oremise considered rhe Appeal should proceed.
Sincerly,
Anthony Mourean
Anthony Alorman 3695 Fin 35/4
OTN 784/ Le Blunc Beaunmut, 7k 77708
Gentheare of Seivice,
Ls Anthony Alorran, do cenfy thar 12 have mailed a tre Copy of the instant document to Austin Hamby , Asst. Texay Arty Geneal P.U. Bow
IZSUB Austin, TX PFW SYK, by plaudag 4 tue copy in the privon mail syst fur Pr clos delivey gn 27 Janey ZUUs.
fii
pg 4 of Y
AE-Aavit Related to Previous Filings
Texas Civil Practices & Remedies Arr. 14.004
T, Anthony Whitney Norman, herein afFant, do hereby State
undér penalty of pergury the following in relation to disclunives required by 1004 "
LK cause no. IM-M~ OOUT3 “CI addfess ng foas@ now 1248967 a Chivrnal conviction Dum the Zoid Dithnt Cour. E raised claims afi Legal Sufficrenty, Factual Sublrsency Prosecu tonal Misconduct, Temp fopes Csrand Jury, Violations
oe Chutce of Cauns el. The (ase. iS srill pending reviely by the TOCA via PD-1uee~t2" see: TRAP Tule 6 YN Cb)y. Anthony Noman vi Texad
2. cause no. unknown-lost. Anthony Noman v. Arata Loan Suc, Salt lo Triufante. Filed in Havnr County JL Diveme Court sOmetime in “20l2.
The cause wara ciiltort asserting convesivn of propetn and wanghal Fore thosure. Cause was ditmnred for want of pOsetubyn against Nara Loan SUC as Twat unable to afb sewite due te no valrd
address being Found. F have been unsuccerhal in pe toverrng the cawe raimber som the Havris Casnty Ditmar Cleck,
2. cause nv. D-I-GN-I8-004768 in the 3uSA Dowie Const Ratied a writ of Mandamus aerfon against PT Shura Keller, and Deana Williamson,
Clerk of the Tem Courref Criminal Appeals. Judge Craunp didmitted she case Citing both a lack of jurrdirion, and citing Criviloust ‘The case
was appealed wo the Bd COA. whith stick rhe Guilousr Eindng, but mamainad lack of Jurir Arison The case then went td the Texar Supreme Cdurr Zl-ocs|, vele@re On a Petition for Dimiretiinary Review.
Zt-osst is snil Pending TRAP 2. 56.5] adjudiatun, OF-)q-O02zA7~_ iV.
=
Y. cause nd. 14-t0-00039-C2 in the IdthtoA. Wrt of Mandamus led against 262nd Judge Lor? Chambers~Gray who has thar refused ro cule on Motion t Vacate Vord Judgment, The COA ditmissed the case complaining of the lack of a cerned record upon whith to wale. “This (ase was sent to the Texar Supreme Court pursuant To Perrtien fer Diirerwnay feview 20-097b, and iv sriil pending adjuditatron » [Tear 56.5 |
5. Cause no. D-1- GN-21-002583 jn rhe Zout Disa Court, Raised civil tort avil Crphrr Vivlatrons, Hele Irbel, negligence, Fraud, hatassement, LonversiOn of proeerty / takings claim, Yofer Suppression. On Mopon, HiT
Pg lof L tase was transfeed to the (2 Distr Court cawe nG, 2220570. This case was dirmsed citing @ lack of jurisdten, Arnlourness, and that the debrdants Claim of a judicial decistan without proof in the secorc
established the Fact thata decision occurred. Thi care war appealed to the iofh Bist Court of Appeals i9-24~ OcoUS CU, whih war
transPered in August 2024 on the premire oF an ORDER fram rhe Texas Supreme Court, 10 wits the APFunt informed the Clek of the 10th shar
“nd jurivdansrion uved the tansy,” Anthony Nornan ve Roca Moure, Beran Colles, Bebby Lumph.a, Ashle, Janak, Tammy Chapman, Shavenda Mathir Nenenl, 6. tause nd. Zdod- $1665 Ex pane Anthony Whitmer Norman - Writ of
Expunttn. Oryinally granted — 12/01/2004 , but alleaedly revoked iets izoda. “The HG. Darter Cleile has recently Aoril of 202 responded to multrofe informairin Fequest, and sent AfGant an order peiprang an August 20i2 den. Tr agpears the Ud Cleler was Bsued without junsderion. Anthony Whimey Normun y State,
7. couse no. D-J-GN-2Y-Ol O26 in the 200! Domer Court, currently pending, citing Teakengs clarer per Tem Cams. Av T $17. Anthory Noman vi Greg Abboyp, Govenos, Brian Collier, Exec. Dir TACT, Kirn Oy,
Hid DA, Showa Keller, PJ TCCAy (ilies Filed 26 December ZU24,
$. cause AO. 2024-38844 jn the 125 Dither Cours cortenrs pending. Suit to Guiet Tiley Treaspws te Tv Title, canversten claim, Anrhoay Nosman ve John Giralde, Manica Liloy , Fabiige? Fnvestmears. Cuclensly peading Filed ZO2Y June .- ” ablionr sayeth Further not.
Po they bp
Unswein Declam hoo
T, Anthony Noman am curtenrly incarcemted in Jebegon Gunn, Texar in the Texas Depr of Ciminal Jusrce C210 & 017/875, EZ state under peaalty of penyy the Rregotny above 75 fue and wrfecr te my beliel
hye py 2% of 2,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anthony Norman v. Ashlei Janak, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier, Shovanda D. Mathis, Margarita Thomas, Rocky Moore, and Tammy Shelby (Anthony Norman v. Ashlei Janak, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier, Shovanda D. Mathis, Margarita Thomas, Rocky Moore, and Tammy Shelby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.