Anthony Martin v. Susan Duffy
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6333
ANTHONY FRED MARTIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUSAN DUFFY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (4:18-cv-00317-DCN)
Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 24, 2018
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Fred Martin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Anthony Fred Martin appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint on the ground that his due process claim is duplicative of that
filed in a different case, and, in the alternative, fails to state a claim. We agree with the
district court that Martin’s allegations—allegations that are nearly identical to those that
we have previously rejected—are insufficient to state a claim, and therefore affirm the
district court’s judgment. Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239, 252-54 (4th Cir. 2017), cert.
denied, 138 S. Ct. 738 (2018); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anthony Martin v. Susan Duffy (Anthony Martin v. Susan Duffy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.