Anthony Mangum v. S. Hallembaek

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anthony Mangum v. S. Hallembaek. Read the opinion of the Court — 910 F.3d 770
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 19, 2019·No. 18-7179·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7179

ANTHONY WAYNE MANGUM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

S. HALLEMBAEK, Warden; CHARLES E. SAMUELS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-hc-02293-FL)

Submitted: January 22, 2019 Decided: August 19, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KEENAN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Wayne Mangum, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Wayne Mangum, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Mangum v. S. Hallembaek, No. 5:16-hc-02283-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 28,

2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Mangum v. S. Hallembaek, (4th Cir. 2019).

Anthony Mangum v. S. Hallembaek (Anthony Mangum v. S. Hallembaek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241