Anthony M. Puchalski v. Howard Yeager, Warden, New Yersey State Prison

372 F.2d 96
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 1, 1967·No. 15907·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, in custody, under the judgment of a State court, was tried on an indictment charging him with homicide and was convicted of murder in the second degree. The judgment of conviction was sustained on appeal to the Supreme Court of New Jersey, State v. Puchalski, 45 N.J. 97, 211 A.2d 370. The matter came before the court below on a petition for habeas corpus in which the appellant attacked the validity of his conviction on grounds substantially the same as those urged on the said appeal. The petition was dismissed and this appeal followed.

It appears from the well reasoned opinion of the court below that the questions raised were carefully considered and properly decided against the appellant.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony M. Puchalski v. Howard Yeager, Warden, New Yersey State Prison, 372 F.2d 96 (3d Cir. 1967).

372 F.2d 96 (Anthony M. Puchalski v. Howard Yeager, Warden, New Yersey State Prison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Puchalski
211 A.2d 370 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)