Anthony M. Giaimo, Laura Giaimo v. United States Government Stanley Matulewic

141 F.3d 1168, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 14310, 1998 WL 71541
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 1998
Docket97-1758
StatusUnpublished

This text of 141 F.3d 1168 (Anthony M. Giaimo, Laura Giaimo v. United States Government Stanley Matulewic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony M. Giaimo, Laura Giaimo v. United States Government Stanley Matulewic, 141 F.3d 1168, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 14310, 1998 WL 71541 (8th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

141 F.3d 1168

81 A.F.T.R.2d 98-881

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Anthony M. GIAIMO, Laura Giaimo, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT; Stanley Matulewic, Appellees.

No. 97-1758.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 7, 1998.
Filed Feb. 23, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Anthony and Laura Giaimo, husband and wife, appeal from the District Court's1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their action to set aside the sale of their properties and to quiet title in their names. After the government seized and sold the Giaimos' properties to satisfy their outstanding federal income tax liability, the Giaimos brought this action, arguing they received deficient notice of the seizure and sale. This court reviews the District Court's grant of summary judgment de novo, see Thomas v. Gunter, 103 F.3d 700, 702 (8th Cir.1997) (standard of review). After conducting such de novo review of the record, and after carefully reviewing the parties' briefs and considering the Giaimos' arguments, we agree with the District Court that, in the circumstances, the Giaimos received sufficient notice of the seizure and sale of their properties. We believe, as did the District Court, that the Giaimos should not be rewarded for their hostile and obstructive conduct. We therefore affirm the District Court's judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 F.3d 1168, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 14310, 1998 WL 71541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-m-giaimo-laura-giaimo-v-united-states-gove-ca8-1998.