Anthony M Coury v. Ibrahim Takla
This text of Anthony M Coury v. Ibrahim Takla (Anthony M Coury v. Ibrahim Takla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
December 23, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
161215 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra ANTHONY M. COURY, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 161215 COA: 351548 Oakland CC: 2019-172427-NO IBRAHIM TAKLA, Defendant-Appellant.
_____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 23, 2020 b1215 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anthony M Coury v. Ibrahim Takla, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-m-coury-v-ibrahim-takla-mich-2020.