Anthony Loforte, Inc. v. Keasey

150 So. 131, 112 Fla. 257
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 6, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 131 (Anthony Loforte, Inc. v. Keasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony Loforte, Inc. v. Keasey, 150 So. 131, 112 Fla. 257 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Order and Decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the reéord having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of' its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said Order and Decree; it is', therefore, considered/ ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Order and Decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Fogg Mill Work & Lumber Co. v. Greer, 102 Fla. 955, 136 Sou. 679 (H. N. 2).

•Affirmed,

Whitfield, P. J., Davis, C. J., and Buford, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fagg Mill Work & Lumber Co. v. Greer
136 So. 679 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 So. 131, 112 Fla. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-loforte-inc-v-keasey-fla-1933.