Anthony Lewis Whalem/hunt v. Richard Early, Warden

218 F.3d 1078, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5538, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 7354, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15882, 2000 WL 963942
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 7, 2000·No. 99-55627·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Lewis Whalem/hunt v. Richard Early, Warden, 218 F.3d 1078, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5538, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 7354, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15882, 2000 WL 963942 (9th Cir. 2000).

218 F.3d 1078 (Anthony Lewis Whalem/hunt v. Richard Early, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anthony Lewis Whalem/hunt v. Rchard Early, Warden
233 F.3d 1146 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)