Anthony Lambert, Sr. v. Alice E. Stallings Ike McRee Brenda G. Williams Velveeta R. Reid Pasquotank County, North Carolina

25 F.3d 1040, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20829, 1994 WL 258527
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 14, 1994
Docket94-1448
StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1040 (Anthony Lambert, Sr. v. Alice E. Stallings Ike McRee Brenda G. Williams Velveeta R. Reid Pasquotank County, North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony Lambert, Sr. v. Alice E. Stallings Ike McRee Brenda G. Williams Velveeta R. Reid Pasquotank County, North Carolina, 25 F.3d 1040, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20829, 1994 WL 258527 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

25 F.3d 1040
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Anthony LAMBERT, Sr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Alice E. STALLINGS; Ike Mcree; Brenda G. Williams;
Velveeta R. Reid; Pasquotank County, North
Carolina, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-1448.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided June 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh, Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.

Anthony Lambert, Sr., appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lambert v. Stallings, No. CA-94-18 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F.3d 1040, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20829, 1994 WL 258527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-lambert-sr-v-alice-e-stallings-ike-mcree-b-ca4-1994.