Anthony King v. Chris Brown
This text of 93 F. App'x 102 (Anthony King v. Chris Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Anthony King appeals the district court’s * adverse judgment following a jury trial on King’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 excessive-force claim. King contends appellee and defense witnesses committed perjury at trial, and his appointed counsel was derelict in her duties. We reject King’s arguments because the jury was entitled to credit the testimony of witnesses, see United States v. Harris, 310 F.3d 1105, 1111 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1052, 123 S.Ct. 2121, 155 L.Ed.2d 1096 (2003); and there is no constitutional or statutory right to effective assistance of counsel in a civil case, see Glide v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir.1988).
We thus affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 F. App'x 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-king-v-chris-brown-ca8-2004.