Anthony Kaminski v. Nancy Berryhill

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided August 30, 2018·No. 17-3314·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 30, 2018

Before

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

AMY C. BARRETT, Circuit Judge No. 17‐3314

ANTHONY KAMINSKI, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff‐Appellant, Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. v. No. 16‐CV‐514 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Jon E. DeGuilio, Defendant‐Appellee. Judge.

O R D E R The Acting Commissioner of Social Security has filed a petition for panel rehearing in which she requests that the panel remove two words from a sentence of the opinion issued on July 9, 2018. The sentence, which appears on page 9 of the slip opinion, states: “At the fifth step, the burden of proof and persuasion is on the agency.” The Acting Commissioner requests that we remove the two words “and persuasion” so that the sentence at issue reads, “At the fifth step, the burden of proof is on the agency.” The petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The sentence on page 9 of the slip opinion that reads: “At the fifth step, the burden of proof and persuasion is on the agency” is hereby AMENDED to read only “At the fifth step, the burden of proof is on the agency.” In addition, the citation to Maresh v. Barnhart on page 9 is AMENDED to indicate the case was from the Eighth Circuit, so that the citation reads: “Maresh v. Barnhart, 438 F.3d 897, 901 (8th Cir. 2006) . . . .” No separate amended opinion will be issued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Kaminski v. Nancy Berryhill, (7th Cir. 2018).

Anthony Kaminski v. Nancy Berryhill (Anthony Kaminski v. Nancy Berryhill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related