Anthony Jerdine v. United States

393 F. App'x 617
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 18, 2010
Docket09-16239
StatusUnpublished

This text of 393 F. App'x 617 (Anthony Jerdine v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony Jerdine v. United States, 393 F. App'x 617 (11th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lewis Jerdine, a felon on supervised release, appeals pro se the denial of his motion to dismiss his information. Fed. R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3)(B). The district court construed Jerdine’s pleading as a motion to vacate, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and dismissed the motion without prejudice at Jerdine’s request. Jerdine challenges the refusal of the district court to treat his filing as a petition for a writ of error coram nobis, but we rejected Jerdine’s argument about that writ in a previous appeal. United States v. Jerdine, 379 Fed.Appx. 963 (11th Cir.2010). The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Jerdine’s motion without prejudice.

We AFFIRM the dismissal of Jerdine’s motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Anthony L. Jerdine
379 F. App'x 963 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
393 F. App'x 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-jerdine-v-united-states-ca11-2010.