Anthony J. Steinkirchner v. Charles E. Wilson, Secretary of National Defense

247 F.2d 83, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 92, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3668
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 13, 1957·No. 13580·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Certain positions in the Navy Department, including appellant’s, were surveyed and downgraded under the Classification Act of 1949, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1071. Some employees who were not veterans got new positions at the old level. Appellant, who was a veteran, did not. He appeals, relying on Section 12 of the Veterans Preference Act as amended, 5 U.S. C.A. § 861. This section provides for military preference in any “reduction in personnel”. Since no such reduction occurred, this section does not apply. Cf. Cutting v. Higley, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 235 F.2d 515, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 883, 77 S.Ct. 99, 1 L.Ed.2d 81; Wagner v. Higley, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 291, 235 F.2d 518, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 936, 77 S. Ct. 230, 1 L.Ed.2d 165. Cf. Parks v. United States, Ct.Cl., 147 F.Supp. 261.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony J. Steinkirchner v. Charles E. Wilson, Secretary of National Defense, 247 F.2d 83, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 92, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3668 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

247 F.2d 83 (Anthony J. Steinkirchner v. Charles E. Wilson, Secretary of National Defense) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bright v. Macy
278 F. Supp. 215 (D. Maryland, 1967)