Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. James P. Hudgins

346 F.2d 113, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5443
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 26, 1965
Docket21716
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 346 F.2d 113 (Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. James P. Hudgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. James P. Hudgins, 346 F.2d 113, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5443 (5th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In October 1962 James P. Hudgins, the claimant, filed an application with the Department of Health, Education and Welfare seeking to establish a period of disability and to collect insurance benefits under the provisions of Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401ff. After several administrative hearings, including a hearing before an examiner, the Hearing Examiner denied Hudgins’s application. The Appeals Council, Bureau of Hearings and Appeals, declined to review the decision of the Hearing Examiner. Hudgins filed suit in the United States District Court for judicial review of the decision of the Hearing Examiner. The Secretary, who had been made a party to the suit, moved that the district court remand the case to the department for the taking of further evidence. After receiving additional evidence, the Hearing Examiner again denied Hudgins’s application and the Appeals Council rendered a decision affirming the Hearing Examiner. Thereupon the decision of the Appeals Council became the “final decision” of the Secretary.

In the opinion below, the district court noted that it had “carefully reviewed” the record in this case, including a 215-page transcript, the pleadings, and “very able briefs filed by both parties”. The court concluded that the decision of the Secretary was not supported by substantial evidence and should be reversed. This Court, too, has carefully reviewed the record and briefs. There is little, if anything, that we can add to the opinion of the district court. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aversa v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
672 F. Supp. 775 (D. New Jersey, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
346 F.2d 113, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-j-celebrezze-secretary-of-health-education-and-welfare-v-james-ca5-1965.