Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Estus Lightsey

Fifth Circuit

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Estus Lightsey

329 F.2d 780, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6001

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 19, 1964

Docket20933

StatusPublished

This text of 329 F.2d 780 (Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Estus Lightsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Estus Lightsey, 329 F.2d 780, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6001 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding before the District Court seeking to reverse an administrative determination that appellee was not entitled to Social Security disability benefits raised only the questions whether there was substantial evidence to support the administrative determination and whether the examiner applied the proper legal principles in deciding this case. We conclude that the trial court erred in reversing the Secretary’s determination, in that it is apparent that the findings were supported by substantial evidence and that the examiner applied the proper legal standards in his consideration of the case. See Celebrezze v. O’Brient, 5 Cir., 323 F.2d 989.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for entry of judgment for the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding before the District Court seeking to reverse an administrative determination that appellee was not entitled to Social Security disability benefits raised only the questions whether there was substantial evidence to support the administrative determination and whether the examiner applied the proper legal principles in deciding this case. We conclude that the trial court erred in reversing the Secretary’s determination, in that it is apparent that the findings were supported by substantial evidence and that the examiner applied the proper legal standards in his consideration of the case. See Celebrezze v. O’Brient, 5 Cir., 323 F.2d 989.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for entry of judgment for the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

329 F.2d 780, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-j-celebrezze-secretary-of-health-education-and-welfare-v-estus-ca5-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack