ANTHONY HOSKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ANTHONY HOSKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (ANTHONY HOSKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ANTHONY HOSKINS, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-680
[July 24, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.801 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara McCarthy, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 14-5075CF10A and 14-14619CF10A.
Anthony Hoskins, Bonifay, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm without prejudice to the defendant’s right to file a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 concerning the voluntariness of his plea. See Wolter v. State, 219 So. 3d 852 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).
LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ANTHONY HOSKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-hoskins-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.