ANTHONY HOSKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in ANTHONY HOSKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA. Read the opinion of the Court — 259 So. 3d 892
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 2019·No. 19-0680·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTHONY HOSKINS, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D19-680

[July 24, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.801 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara McCarthy, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 14-5075CF10A and 14-14619CF10A.

Anthony Hoskins, Bonifay, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to the defendant’s right to file a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 concerning the voluntariness of his plea. See Wolter v. State, 219 So. 3d 852 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANTHONY HOSKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

ANTHONY HOSKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (ANTHONY HOSKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wolter v. State
219 So. 3d 852 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)