Anthony Hayes v. Randy Watson
This text of Anthony Hayes v. Randy Watson (Anthony Hayes v. Randy Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-2273 ___________________________
Anthony Hayes
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Randy Watson, Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction; Claudia Harris, Deputy Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction; Mitchell Johnson, Jr., Captain, Arkansas Department of Correction; Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, Arkansas Department of Correction; Michael M. Lowe, Major, Arkansas Department of Correction; Itena Jackson, Classification Officer, Arkansas Department of Correction
Defendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________
Submitted: January 17, 2023 Filed: January 20, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, BENTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Anthony Hayes, an inmate in the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC), appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
This court concludes that the district court properly granted summary judgment. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo, viewing the record in a light most favorable to the non-moving party). Hayes failed to comply with the ADC’s grievance procedure by filing an untimely initial grievance. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 88, 93 (2006) (prisoner must exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with prison’s applicable procedural rules, including deadlines). He also did not show that his administrative remedies were unavailable. See Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 643-44 (2016). To the extent Hayes raises additional arguments on appeal, they present no basis for reversal.
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anthony Hayes v. Randy Watson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-hayes-v-randy-watson-ca8-2023.