Anthony Haubrich v. U.S. Bank National Association

720 F.3d 979, 2013 WL 3822148, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 15111
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2013·No. 12-3194·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s 1 order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss their quiet-title claims. Following de novo review, we agree with the district court that plaintiffs’ complaint allegations provide no factual support for conclusory and speculative assertions concerning deficiencies in the assignment and recording of notes and mortgages preceding foreclosure proceedings. See Blaylock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 502 Fed.Appx. 623, 623-24 (8th Cir.2013) (unpublished per curiam); Karnatcheva v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 704 F.3d 545, 547-48 (8th Cir.), petition for cert. filed, 81 USLW 3670 (Apr. 29, 2013) (No. 12-1303). We therefore affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Haubrich v. U.S. Bank National Association, 720 F.3d 979, 2013 WL 3822148, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 15111 (8th Cir. 2013).

720 F.3d 979 (Anthony Haubrich v. U.S. Bank National Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Natalia Karnatcheva v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
704 F.3d 545 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)
Pamela Blaylock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
502 F. App'x 623 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)