Anthony Haubrich v. U.S. Bank National Association
This text of 720 F.3d 979 (Anthony Haubrich v. U.S. Bank National Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s 1 order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss their quiet-title claims. Following de novo review, we agree with the district court that plaintiffs’ complaint allegations provide no factual support for conclusory and speculative assertions concerning deficiencies in the assignment and recording of notes and mortgages preceding foreclosure proceedings. See Blaylock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 502 Fed.Appx. 623, 623-24 (8th Cir.2013) (unpublished per curiam); Karnatcheva v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 704 F.3d 545, 547-48 (8th Cir.), petition for cert. filed, 81 USLW 3670 (Apr. 29, 2013) (No. 12-1303). We therefore affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
720 F.3d 979, 2013 WL 3822148, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 15111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-haubrich-v-us-bank-national-association-ca8-2013.