Anthony Foster v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 8, 2009·No. 04-09-00133-CR·Published

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00133-CR

Anthony FOSTER, Appellant

v.

STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008-CR-6089 Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 8, 2009

DISMISSED

The trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea

bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d)

provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of

appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). Accordingly,

on March 23, 2009, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to

Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows defendant has the right of appeal 04-09-00133-CR

was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San

Antonio 2003, order); TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1.

On March 24, 2009, defendant’s appellate counsel filed a letter stating “this court has no

choice but to dismiss the appeal.” In light of the record presented, we agree with defendant’s counsel

that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Foster v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Anthony Foster v. State (Anthony Foster v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)