Anthony Edwin Hurley v. Municipality of Prince George's County County Executive, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, in Their Official Capacities Only

60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24874, 1995 WL 419290
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 13, 1995
Docket95-6544
StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 822 (Anthony Edwin Hurley v. Municipality of Prince George's County County Executive, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, in Their Official Capacities Only) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony Edwin Hurley v. Municipality of Prince George's County County Executive, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, in Their Official Capacities Only, 60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24874, 1995 WL 419290 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Anthony Edwin HURLEY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
MUNICIPALITY OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY; County Executive,
Upper Marlboro, Maryland, in their official
capacities only, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6544.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 13, 1995.

Anthony Edwin Hurley, appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hurley v. Municipality of Prince George's County, No. CA-95-686-PJM (D.Md. Mar. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24874, 1995 WL 419290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-edwin-hurley-v-municipality-of-prince-geor-ca4-1995.