Anthony Drugs of Bethpage, Inc. v. Local 1199 Drug & Hospital Union

34 A.D.2d 788, 311 N.Y.S.2d 622, 74 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2832, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4908
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 11, 1970
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 34 A.D.2d 788 (Anthony Drugs of Bethpage, Inc. v. Local 1199 Drug & Hospital Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony Drugs of Bethpage, Inc. v. Local 1199 Drug & Hospital Union, 34 A.D.2d 788, 311 N.Y.S.2d 622, 74 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2832, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, the first dated December 8, 1969, which granted respondent’s motion to open its default in opposing the proceeding, and the second dated January 6, 1970, which granted respondent’s motion to vacate petitioner’s demand for a jury trial on the issue of whether or not there was a valid agreement to arbitrate. Order dated December 8, 1969 affirmed. No opinion. Order dated January 6, 1970 reversed, on the law, and respondent’s motion to vacate the demand for a jury trial denied. Appellant is awarded $10 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Although the UPLR does not make express provision for trial by jury of matters preliminary to arbitration, it was not the intent of the framers to thereby eliminate trial by jury where constitutionally required or desirable (Matter of MVAIC [Stein], 23 A D 2d 526, 527; 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 7503.24 ; 22 Carmody Wait 2d, New York Practice, § 141:74). The contention that a party has not bound himself to arbitrate raises a factual question which entitles him to a trial by jury (Matter of Finsilver, Still & Moss v. Goldberg, Maas & Co., 253 N. Y. 382, 390; Matter of Bernson Silk Mills v. Siegel & Co., 256 App. Div. 617, 620). Christ, P. J., Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Sparacio
25 A.D.3d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Companies v. Jackson
12 A.D.3d 1142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
McSpedon v. Profile Electric, Inc.
137 A.D.2d 669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Grossman v. Laurence Handprints-N.J., Inc.
90 A.D.2d 95 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A.D.2d 788, 311 N.Y.S.2d 622, 74 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2832, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-drugs-of-bethpage-inc-v-local-1199-drug-hospital-union-nyappdiv-1970.