Anthony Dorsett v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Anthony Dorsett v. State of Florida

166 So. 3d 898, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8468, 2015 WL 3488181

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 3, 2015

Docket4D15-144

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 166 So. 3d 898 (Anthony Dorsett v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anthony Dorsett v. State of Florida, 166 So. 3d 898, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8468, 2015 WL 3488181 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion. Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011); Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). “[R]eview of the record establishes that the defendant did not satisfy the burden of showing entitlement to relief on the face of the record.” Johnson, 60 So.3d at 1051 n. 2. Appellant’s second claim is meritless as the alleged disproportionality between his sentence, and the sentence of his co-defendant, does not establish an “illegal sentence” cognizable under rule 3.800(a). Shivers v. State, 96 So.3d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Affirmed.

GERBER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion. Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011); Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). “[R]eview of the record establishes that the defendant did not satisfy the burden of showing entitlement to relief on the face of the record.” Johnson, 60 So.3d at 1051 n. 2. Appellant’s second claim is meritless as the alleged disproportionality between his sentence, and the sentence of his co-defendant, does not establish an “illegal sentence” cognizable under rule 3.800(a). Shivers v. State, 96 So.3d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Affirmed.

GERBER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 So. 3d 898, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8468, 2015 WL 3488181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-dorsett-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack