Anthony David Teague v. State

Opinion

_ /\/0.0(a“» l('(~OOQ§g,CQ m*:€§§::&%p';.sf/l/THE acl/gm ;:AWE,A,LS

(` S'~ D‘t

;°;;i; fame § M* TUDfU/H~D¢SW 1‘7‘5¥€»€@'3 nwka " TEXAQ ‘26,/7_20/3 j:/z/THB 2/@+¢\ D/SW{JCDUATOF C,cu.l A/ CqM/TH T;;m +z>l§:s w //I'¢m/¢,%@ C/o/w §§ /1/04»¢/<)(10;9xiLzJ¢H\/T,A ,@¢QS~@/ cide +¢\.g Hé»/mb/e QM+ ~/D ISS

.»\ m am mqmbe,Q/MM//@/W@, AW@¢/m lms ¢'>\M we GMW€ €»MM/AW@¢/s M he W,§L@ ¢z> W.W, w ¢~W 1b H/¢@L /@Msw@'/

Di§cre+/NWY F`@we'./ cw/ WWM“/m F¢’/‘h+'”" "¢/”6"/71¢//@/. \-///Q,an+w/»§A@§ 75 `Froc€€f w/”fh l/\V.’> /4/9///€¢¢0/\ Wr'M/,'~,‘F old 1‘&5€45 C¢>r/wz md€rAr+,b/(.O?T`@@CCP ~ QN/ des,)~¢§ fla wm/m‘e +o 100 d$s@eé{~F/om +¢\@,' &”+W{fm ll alwwa>;fe squ iv &Afv¢ju~z@/W w %@@th»z¢€//mm /,¢§¢;>&@ impierqu M/WMM

wHeQ@/>W wr@,».z@ wsm/afdc 145be WPR. 1311 Ap/d@#m,,ym:

l

Ky\D-hp/\ +O I;SL¢,€ WMJW)L& LCLQVZMM . ` cwa n - 7` w(._ A¢ye[%'p:§&

§ERTrFr&/’FT€ OP SEQ\/ lag

; Wb/ w°'£“ay +M' @1 ‘JLW& wf @¢+Ieme, M~ safe 313/w /4,»€,,[¢+@@;, q-’L 2100 éla,,M/o[e |Q,{ S‘fg, ZDDG /1/1& gnma/fu 7507{ an ‘/"¢~6 \HL£ lq?€\ 0{47 075/4,5“871. _ 201§; ‘ ‘

/4MH‘° DOWVZ/-]:Mjw€, TDCR 'DE#: M'?Mlp O¢L, Lu`h\eV Um‘i' {*§OD Lw¢Lme/€, Mvdgoiq/ T_J<' 77%3