Anthony D. Duke v. Joel Hoch, Home Indemnity Company, Garnishee-Appellee

475 F.2d 761, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11200
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 20, 1972·No. 71-2223·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By our decision in Duke v. Hoch, et al., 468 F.2d 973 (5th Cir., 1972) we reversed a judgment entered for the insurer-garnishee and remanded for further proceedings. Counsel for the appellant has filed a motion for allowance of attorney fees for his services on appeal, pursuant to Florida Statute 627.428, F.S.A. 1 The motion is denied without prejudice to application in the trial court for fees allowable under § 627.428, for services on appeal, should the appellant ultimately “prevail.” “While he has won a round in this bout, the cause is not yet concluded in his favor, and we think that he has not yet ‘prevailed’ in the statutory sense.” Segelstrom v. Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 233 So.2d 645, 646 (Fla.App.1970). As in Segelstrom, “should final judgment be entered for [appellant] the trial judge may then evaluate the briefs filed in aid of this appeal and determine appropriate compensation.” Id. at 646.

1

. Formerly § 627.0127.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony D. Duke v. Joel Hoch, Home Indemnity Company, Garnishee-Appellee, 475 F.2d 761, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11200 (5th Cir. 1972).

475 F.2d 761 (Anthony D. Duke v. Joel Hoch, Home Indemnity Company, Garnishee-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
483 F.3d 1265 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)
Hodges v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
488 F. Supp. 1057 (D. South Carolina, 1980)