Anthony Cline v. State
This text of Anthony Cline v. State (Anthony Cline v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00260-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
BORDER SWABBING, INC., Appellant,
v.
RICCI LEE POZZI, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Border Swabbing, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by
the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 08-2098-E.
Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have settled
their dispute. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to
dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a). Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)
("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").
Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 21st day of June, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Anthony Cline v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-cline-v-state-texapp-2012.