Anthony Charles McVea v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 16, 2019·No. 04-19-00617-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 16, 2019

No. 04-19-00617-CR

Anthony Charles MCVEA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 614181

Honorable Melissa Vara, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The clerk’s record shows that appellant was charged by information with resisting arrest.

Appellant filed a pro se motion to suppress and a pro se notice of appeal on the same day, September 4, 2019. The record contains no final judgment or other appealable order. In addition, the record reflects that appellant is represented by counsel and therefore may not simultaneously proceed pro se. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981) (there is no right to hybrid representation in Texas). Accordingly, appellant is hereby ORDERED to show cause in writing within ten (10) days from the date of this order stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of October, 2019.

LUZ ESTRADA, Chief Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Charles McVea v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Anthony Charles McVea v. State (Anthony Charles McVea v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)