Anthony Atkins v. Grady W. Donaldson, Jr. William W. Sweeney
Opinion
57 F.3d 1065
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Grady W. DONALDSON, Jr.; William W. Sweeney, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-7394.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 16, 1995.
Anthony Atkins, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Donaldson, No. CA-94-1022-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
57 F.3d 1065 (Anthony Atkins v. Grady W. Donaldson, Jr. William W. Sweeney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.