Anthony Atkins v. Augusta Correctional Center Central Classification Board, Augusta Correctional Center

Fourth Circuit

Anthony Atkins v. Augusta Correctional Center Central Classification Board, Augusta Correctional Center

54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17401, 1995 WL 302253

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 18, 1995

Docket94-7270

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 772 (Anthony Atkins v. Augusta Correctional Center Central Classification Board, Augusta Correctional Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anthony Atkins v. Augusta Correctional Center Central Classification Board, Augusta Correctional Center, 54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17401, 1995 WL 302253 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 772
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AUGUSTA CORRECTIONAL CENTER; Central Classification Board,
Augusta Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7270.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 18, 1995.

Anthony Atkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 (1988) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Augusta Correctional Ctr., No. CA-94-881-R (W.D.Va. Oct. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motion for production of documents

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 772
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AUGUSTA CORRECTIONAL CENTER; Central Classification Board,
Augusta Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7270.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 18, 1995.

Anthony Atkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 (1988) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Augusta Correctional Ctr., No. CA-94-881-R (W.D.Va. Oct. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motion for production of documents

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17401, 1995 WL 302253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-atkins-v-augusta-correctional-center-centr-ca4-1995.