Anthony Amirikhass v. Walmart Inc.

• Court: District Court, C.D. California
• Decided: November 20, 2023
• Docket: 2:23-cv-02088
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL CaseNo. CV 23-2088 FMO (MRWx) Date November 20, 2023 Title Anthony Amirikhass v. Walmart Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions or Dismissal Pursuant to the Court’s Order of May 4, 2023, the parties were required to complete a settlement conference before a private mediator no later than November 7, 2023. (See Dkt. 12, Court’s Order of May 4, 2023, at 17). If the case settled, the parties were required to file a Notice of Settlement no later than 24 hours after settlement. (See id.). Otherwise, the parties were required to file a Status Report Re: Settlement no later than 48 hours after the settlement conference was complete. (See id.). As of the filing date of this Order, neither a Notice of Settlement nor a Status Report Re: Settlement has been filed. (See, generally, Dkt.). Accordingly, IT |S ORDERED THAT, no later than November 29, 2023, the parties shall show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court’s Order of May 4, 2023. Failure to submit a response to this Order by the deadline set forth above may result in the imposition of sanctions and/or dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962); Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 909 (2003).

00 : 00 Initials of Preparer vdr