Anthony Alfieri v. Cortland Management LLC, et al.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedDecember 22, 2025
Docket2:25-cv-04360
StatusUnknown

This text of Anthony Alfieri v. Cortland Management LLC, et al. (Anthony Alfieri v. Cortland Management LLC, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony Alfieri v. Cortland Management LLC, et al., (D. Ariz. 2025).

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Anthony Alfieri, No. CV-25-04360-PHX-KML

10 Plaintiff, ORDER

11 v.

12 Cortland Management LLC, et al.,

13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Anthony Alfieri believes defendant Cortland Management LLC violated 16 the Fair Housing Act by discriminating against him based on his familial status and by 17 retaliating against him after he submitted a complaint to the U.S. Department of Housing 18 and Urban Development. The court dismissed Alfieri’s original complaint because he had 19 not identified any concrete harm he suffered because of Cortland’s alleged actions. The 20 original complaint also lacked sufficient allegations tying Cortland’s alleged actions to 21 Alfieri’s familial status or his agency complaint. (Doc. 6.) Alfieri was granted leave to 22 amend and he filed an amended complaint. (Doc. 7.) 23 According to the amended complaint, Alfieri has received from Cortland “more than 24 15 noise complaints” on days when his daughter was present and no noise complaints on 25 other days. (Doc. 7 at 6.) Alfieri submitted his HUD Complaint on September 15, 2025, 26 and “[w]ithin 48 hours” Cortland demanded a higher rent payment. (Doc. 7 at 6.) Finally, 27 Cortland sent a bill to Alfieri indicating his rent had been raised for the month of December 28 2025. Cortland demanded a rental payment that is “$1,146.11 above the lease rate of 1 $1,696.” (Doc. 7 at 6.) These additional allegations establish Alfieri should serve the 2 amended complaint. 3 IT IS ORDERED Alfieri is responsible for service of the summons and the 4 amended complaint. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties are advised of the following preliminary 6 policies and procedures that will govern these proceedings. 7 Governing Rules 8 Both counsel and pro se litigants must abide by the Rules of Practice of the U.S. 9 District Court for the District of Arizona (“Local Rules”) and the Federal Rules of Civil 10 Procedure. 11 Disclosure Statements 12 Full compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 is required by plaintiff(s) 13 and defendant(s). Rule 7.1(a)(1) requires any nongovernmental corporation to file a 14 disclosure statement identifying “any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation 15 owning 10% or more of its stock.” Rule 7.1(a)(2) requires a party in an action where 16 jurisdiction is based on diversity under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) to file a disclosure statement 17 identifying the citizenship of “every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to 18 that party.” A Corporate Disclosure Statement form is available at 19 https://www.azd.uscourts.gov/forms/disclosure-statement. 20 Service Deadline 21 Service of the summons and complaint on each defendant located in the United 22 States must occur within 90 days of filing the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). If service 23 cannot occur within 90 days, a request for an extension may be filed before expiration of 24 the 90-day period. Any such request must set forth the reason why service has not been 25 accomplished and request a specific short additional period of time. If the court believes 26 your reason constitutes “good cause,” it will authorize a brief additional period to 27 accomplish service. 28 Proof of service must be filed with the Clerk of Court, in the form of an affidavit, 1 promptly after service has been made. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). It is important to comply 2 with this requirement because absent proof of service, the court will have no way of 3 knowing that the complaint has been served. 4 This order serves as an express warning that the court will dismiss this action, 5 without further notice to plaintiff(s), with respect to any defendant that is not timely served. 6 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 7 Forms of Papers 8 The parties shall adhere to all of the requirements of Local Rule 7.1, including the 9 requirement that text and footnotes shall be no smaller than 13 point. Citations supporting 10 any textual proposition shall be included in the text, not in a footnote. 11 Notices of supplemental authority and responses to those notices are limited to 350 12 words excluding case captions and signature blocks. 13 Paper Courtesy Copies 14 Do not send paper courtesy copies of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7(a) 15 pleadings, short procedural motions (e.g., motions for extension of time), 26(f) reports, or 16 stipulations. A paper courtesy copy of dispositive motions (or other lengthy motions that 17 will be opposed) and any responses or replies thereto shall be either postmarked and mailed 18 to the judge or hand-delivered to the judge’s mailbox in the courthouse by the next business 19 day after the electronic filing. Do not attempt to deliver documents to the judge’s chambers. 20 Courtesy copies should be double-sided and include the ECF-generated header at the top 21 of each page. Courtesy copies of documents too large for stapling must be submitted in 22 three-ring binders. 23 Amending Pleadings 24 Before filing a motion for leave to amend a pleading, the party that wishes to amend 25 must seek the consent of the other parties in an attempt to file the amended pleading 26 pursuant to Local Rule 15.1(b). If any party is unwilling to consent, the motion for leave 27 to amend must indicate which party (or parties) will oppose the request. If a motion for 28 leave to amend a pleading fails to so indicate, the motion will be denied without prejudice 1 for failure to adhere to this order. 2 Motions and Stipulations 3 Every motion or stipulation, however mundane, must cite the rule(s) and/or law(s) 4 that permit the court to grant the requested relief. Requests for extensions of time must 5 include a brief explanation of why the extension is needed to help the court determine 6 whether there is good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A). 7 To ensure timely case processing, a party moving for an extension of time, 8 enlargement of page limitations, or leave to file a document under seal shall indicate in the 9 motion whether the non-movant opposes the request and intends to file a written response. 10 If such a motion does not so indicate, it may be denied for failure to comply with this order. 11 Motions and stipulations should be accompanied by proposed orders. A proposed 12 order is not necessary for motions that will require a reasoned analysis from the court, or 13 for stipulations requesting issuance of the court’s standard protective order with no 14 amendments. These proposed orders must not be on letterhead or contain any information 15 identifying the party submitting the order, and they must set forth the relief requested rather 16 than incorporating the motion or stipulation by reference. See also Local Rule 7.1(b)(3). 17 Proposed orders must be emailed—in Microsoft Word format (not PDF)—to 18 Lanham_Chambers@azd.uscourts.gov. The subject line of the email must include the case 19 name, case number, the words “proposed order for [name of motion],” and an indication 20 of whether the motion is opposed or unopposed if this is not otherwise apparent from the 21 name of the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anthony Alfieri v. Cortland Management LLC, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-alfieri-v-cortland-management-llc-et-al-azd-2025.