Anthony Alexander Campbell v. Bert Rice

386 F.3d 1258, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22255
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anthony Alexander Campbell v. Bert Rice. Read the opinion of the Court — 408 F.3d 1166
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2004·No. 99-17311·Published

Opinion

386 F.3d 1258

Anthony Alexander CAMPBELL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Bert RICE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 99-17311.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 26, 2004.

Anthony Alexander Campbell, Blythe, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Walter F. Brown, Jr., Gary Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP, John R. Vance, Jr., Special Asst. U.S. Atty., Stan M. Helfman, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes:

1

Judge O'Scannlain, Judge Hawkins and Judge Rawlinson are recused

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anthony Alexander Campbell v. Bert Rice, 386 F.3d 1258, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22255 (9th Cir. 2004).

386 F.3d 1258 (Anthony Alexander Campbell v. Bert Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.