Anthony Alex Deleon v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 11, 2015
Docket04-15-00090-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Anthony Alex Deleon v. State (Anthony Alex Deleon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony Alex Deleon v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

..

CAUSE NO. CR-13-1992-C-R-B • Jl3MM FEB f 1 2015 tY'f 1

THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 2$TH DEBRA CROW u J~ d;)!1m9urt, GuadaJuPe Co Ti

® vs. DISTRICT COURT OF ANTHONY DELEON GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE COURT:

COMES NOW ANTHONY DELEON, hereinafter known as Defendant, by

and through his Attorney of Record, Mark Janssed, and files this

his Motion for New Trial, and for cause of which would show the following: I.

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 21, allows the filing

of a Motion for New Trial within thirty days of the date the trial court imposes sentence in open court. Sentence was imposed in open

court on January 28, 2015.

II.

As grounds for the granting of a new trial, D¢fendant, through his Attorney, alleges that any of the following occurred:

a) the defendant was unlawfully tried in absentia or was denied

counsel;

b) the court misdirected the jury about the law or committed some other material error that likely injured the defendant's rights; c) the verdict was decided by lot or in a manner ¢ther than a fair expression of the jurors' opinion; i I

d) a juror was bribed to convict or was guilty of ~ny other corrupt conduct;

I I ... 0 e) a material defense witness was kept from court by force,

threats, or fraud, or evidence tending to establish the defendant's

innocence was intentionally destroyed or withheld, thus preventing

its production at trial;

f) after retiring to deliberate, the jury received other evidence,

or a juror talked with anyone about the case, or ~ juror became so

intoxicated that his or her vote was probably ·influenced as a

result;

g) the jury engaged in such misconduct that the defendant did not

receive a fair and impartial trial;

h) the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence;

i) defendant's trial counsel was ineffective.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant prays that a new

trial be granted. Respectfully submitted,

Mark Janssen\ Attorney for Defendant 110 East San Antonio San Marcos, Tex~s 78666 512-396-0066 512-396-0075 FAX Bar No. 10571950

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE i I hereby certify that a true and correct copyiof the foregoing I

instrument was delivered to the office of the dis~rict attorney of !

Guadalupe County, Texas in accordance with thei Texas Rules of

Procedure on this the 11th day of February, 2015. ,,-- • 0 0

AoM a~ Mark Janssen\ Attorney for Defendant

l t

I ~·· .. 0 0 CAUSE NO. CR-13-1992-C-R-B THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 25TH JUDICIAL

vs. DISTRICT COURT OF ANTHONY DELEON GUADALUPE: COUNTY, TEXAS

0 R D E R

On this the day of

----- , came on to be heard the Motion for New Trial, and after

considering same, it is the opinion of the Courti that the Motion

should be:

GRANTED- - - - - '·

DENIED- - - - - -

PRESIDING JUD~E CAUSE NO. CR-13-1992-C-R-B

THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 25TH JUDICIAL vs. DISTRICT COURT OF

ANTHONY DELEON GUADALUPE: COUNTY, TEXAS 0 R D E R

----- , came on to be heard the Motion for New Trial, and after

considering same, it is the opinion of the Court. that the Motion

should be: GRANTED - - - - -; DENIED- - - - -

PRESIDING JUD~E !

i11011s

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anthony Alex Deleon v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-alex-deleon-v-state-texapp-2015.