Anthony A. Thigpen v. Clarence L. Jackson Lewis W. Hurst John A. Brown Gail Y. Browne Jacqueline F. Fraser

43 F.3d 1468, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40087, 1994 WL 702347
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 16, 1994
Docket94-6874
StatusUnpublished

This text of 43 F.3d 1468 (Anthony A. Thigpen v. Clarence L. Jackson Lewis W. Hurst John A. Brown Gail Y. Browne Jacqueline F. Fraser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony A. Thigpen v. Clarence L. Jackson Lewis W. Hurst John A. Brown Gail Y. Browne Jacqueline F. Fraser, 43 F.3d 1468, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40087, 1994 WL 702347 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

43 F.3d 1468

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony A. THIGPEN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Clarence L. JACKSON; Lewis W. Hurst; John A. Brown; Gail
Y. Browne; Jacqueline F. Fraser, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6874.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 17, 1994
Decided Dec. 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-94-48-AM)

Anthony A. Thigpen, Appellant pro se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, Office of the Atty Gen. of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thigpen v. Jackson, No. CA-94-48-AM (E.D. Va. July 11, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 F.3d 1468, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40087, 1994 WL 702347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-a-thigpen-v-clarence-l-jackson-lewis-w-hurst-john-a-brown-gail-ca4-1994.