Anterio v. Anterio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Anterio v. Anterio

7 A.D.2d 1010, 184 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9569

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 1010 (Anterio v. Anterio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anterio v. Anterio, 7 A.D.2d 1010, 184 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, Family Court Division, Kings County, which denied appellant’s motion for a rehearing and a modification of a prior order of said court directing him to pay $50 a week for the support of respondent and the infant son of the parties based on appellant’s potential earnings of $100 a week. Order reversed, and proceeding remitted to the Domestic Relations Court for a further hearing as to the financial circumstances of the respective parties, including testimony as to what disposition respondent has made as to the $5,000 in weekly payments received from the former business and with respect to the $5,000 in shares of the former business. On this record it does not appear that the court took into consideration the financial status of respondent or her earnings. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, Family Court Division, Kings County, which denied appellant’s motion for a rehearing and a modification of a prior order of said court directing him to pay $50 a week for the support of respondent and the infant son of the parties based on appellant’s potential earnings of $100 a week. Order reversed, and proceeding remitted to the Domestic Relations Court for a further hearing as to the financial circumstances of the respective parties, including testimony as to what disposition respondent has made as to the $5,000 in weekly payments received from the former business and with respect to the $5,000 in shares of the former business. On this record it does not appear that the court took into consideration the financial status of respondent or her earnings. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 1010, 184 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anterio-v-anterio-nyappdiv-1959.