Antelo v. Antelo

27 A.D.2d 825, 278 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4573
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 1967·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order of the Family Court, entered October 5, 1966, directing respondent to pay $20 weekly for the support of his son, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, without costs and without disbursements, and the matter remanded to the Family Court, New York County, for a further hearing [826] at which proof shall be adduced consistent with the following. While we recognize that procedure in the Family Court is to an extent informal, there was no proof adduced in the first instance of the child’s needs. The record is deficient, moreover, in failing to show the father’s changed circumstances, his assets, earnings, expenses and obligations, all necessary to reach a proper conclusion as to a fair and reasonable amount for the support of the child. The order of October 5, 1966 shall continue in effect as a temporary order of support pursuant to section 434 of the Family Court Act. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Antelo v. Antelo, 27 A.D.2d 825, 278 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

27 A.D.2d 825 (Antelo v. Antelo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waby v. Waby
143 A.D.2d 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Nowacki v. Nowacki
90 A.D.2d 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Boden v. Boden
366 N.E.2d 791 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Reynolds v. Reynolds
50 A.D.2d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)