Antee Vs. Antee

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 25, 2020·No. 81292·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LINDSEY SHARRON ANTEE, No. 81292 Appellant,

vs.

BOBBY LEE ANTEE, A/K/A BOBBY FILED DEE ANTEE,

Res ondent. JUN 2 5 2020

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL By

This is a pro se appeal from a divorce decree entered in the district court's minute order of May 22, 2020. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Rena G. Hughes, Judge.

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to be untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it appears that it was prematurely filed, before the entry of a final written judgment, and is therefore of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1); Rust v. Clark Cty. School District, 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987) (explaining that the district court's oral pronouncement from the bench, the clerk's minute order, and even an unfiled written order cannot be appealed). This court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

. Par aguirre

, J. J.

Hardesty Cadish

SUPFEMCOOM OF Nomoit

(0) I 947A mairo jo-2110°

-

cc: Hon. Rena G. Hughes, District Judge, Family Court Division Lindsey Sharron Antee Shumway Van Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4s100), 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Antee Vs. Antee, (Neb. 2020).

Antee Vs. Antee (Antee Vs. Antee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rust v. Clark County School District
747 P.2d 1380 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1987)