Antanitis v. Hecht

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Antanitis v. Hecht

247 A.2d 225, 432 Pa. 620, 1968 Pa. LEXIS 566

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 12, 1968

DocketAppeal, No. 129

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.2d 225 (Antanitis v. Hecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Antanitis v. Hecht, 247 A.2d 225, 432 Pa. 620, 1968 Pa. LEXIS 566 (Pa. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

This is an appeal by defendant after a jury verdict for plaintiffs in claims arising from an automobile collision. The evidence as to negligence was conflicting, the verdicts were not excessive, and there was no error of law or abuse of discretion in the lower Court’s refusal to grant a new trial or a judgment n.o.v.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Musmanno did not participate in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

This is an appeal by defendant after a jury verdict for plaintiffs in claims arising from an automobile collision. The evidence as to negligence was conflicting, the verdicts were not excessive, and there was no error of law or abuse of discretion in the lower Court’s refusal to grant a new trial or a judgment n.o.v.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Musmanno did not participate in the decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.2d 225, 432 Pa. 620, 1968 Pa. LEXIS 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/antanitis-v-hecht-pa-1968.